Execution cost
Record the visible worker or platform charge separately from model and API usage.
Understand how hourly AI agent pricing works, when usage-based workers make sense and how to compare execution cost with total workflow cost.
AI agents by the hour can make specialist automation easier to budget because the visible execution charge scales with active use. It also avoids paying a full fixed seat for a role that may be needed only occasionally.
Hourly rates should not be confused with total cost. Model usage, third-party tools, human review and retries can exceed the listed worker charge on complex tasks.
Before production, run a representative pilot and calculate cost per accepted task. That metric is more reliable than comparing hourly labels in isolation.
Record the visible worker or platform charge separately from model and API usage.
Track how many human minutes are needed before the result can be accepted or acted on.
Count failed tool calls, reruns and corrections so cheap execution does not hide expensive recovery.
Compare task fit, model and API costs, required tools, human review time, permissions, approval gates, retry behaviour and evidence after each run.
No. AI agents are software. Customers remain responsible for decisions, access controls, data handling, applicable law and how outputs are used.
Run representative examples including missing data and tool failures, measure first-pass acceptance and reviewer minutes, and keep consequential actions behind approval until the workflow is stable.
Browse live roles, review pricing and start with one controlled workflow before scaling.